Court revokes bail granted to ex-Mainstreet Bank’s MD, Ukandu

A Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos, has revoked the bail granted to banker, Chester Onyeamachi Ukandu who is standing trial on a three-count charge bordering on forgery and impersonation.
The court presided over by Justice Olusola Williams revoked Ukandu’s bail for breaching the conditions of bail granted him and acting in a manner capable of jeopardizing the course of justice in the case.
Ukandu, a former Managing Director of Mainstreet Bank Registrar Limited alongside one Achi George were first arraigned before the court by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on March 19, 2018, over alleged forging Corporate Affairs Commission (C.A.C.) documents.
According to the charge sheet, they were arraigned among other counts for conspiracy to forge documents contrary to sections 409 and 363(1) of the criminal law of Lagos State of Nigeria, 2011.
EFCC prosecutor, Mrs. Zainab Ettu, had informed the court that the suspects between February 6 and 7, 2012, conspired among themselves and forged the letter headed paper of Mainstreet Bank Registrars Limited, with registration number: 613674, claiming that it emanated from Mainstreet Bank’s Registrars Limited. 
They were also accused of forging a Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) Form 2A, claiming that it emanated from CAC. 
Ettu informed the court that the two suspects, who had retired from the company  unlawfully converted the company’s properties and bank account with Skye Bank for personal use.
The prosecutor also informed the court that the two defendants were apprehended after investigation was conducted on a petition written by the Company’s lawyer, Dr. Charles Mekwunye, after which they were consequently charged before the court.
The defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges and following their plea, their Lawyer, Samuel Agwuh, informed the court that he had filed bail applications, and urged the court to grant his clients bail in the most liberal terms. 
They were subsequently granted bail and as well remanded in prison custody pending the perfection of their bail conditions.
One of the conditions for bail granted by Justice Williams was a strict warning to the defendants that until the final determination of the suit or any other suits in the Federal High Court, pertaining to the ownership of the Mainstreet Bank Registrars Limited, the defendants should desist from holding themselves out as officers of the company and other correspondences in that regard.
However, the EFCC by a motion on Notice dated January 15, 2019, complained to the court that the 1st defendant, Ukandu has breached some of the bail conditions by acting in a manner capable of jeopardizing the course of justice in the case.
A.B.C Ozioko, the EFCC prosecutor, while praying the court to revoke the Ukandu’s bail told the court that instead of being sober and face the charge of forgery against him, the 1st defendant continued to engaged in chest-beating braggado contrary to his bail conditions.
According to EFCC prosecutor, the first defendant continued to write numerous petitions against the prosecution star witness in the matter, seeking to intimidate, harass and embarrass the witness.
Ukandu was also accused of writing a petition to the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) against a lawyer, who is also a witness in his matter, after he was granted bail.
EFCC said Ukandu has taken active steps to interfere with the successful prosecution of the case against him since and therefore urged the court to revoke his bail.
However, Ukandu in his response, denied all the EFCC allegations against him. Ukandu said in full compliance of the bail conditions, he has refrained from addressing himself as a Director or the Chairman of Mainstreet Bank Registrars Limited and has not authored any letter or petition with the same title since he was granted bail.
The defendant also denied ever writing any petition against any officer of the anti-graft agency since the court granted him bail on April 12, 2018.
Ukandu contended that the bail conditions ordered by the court never precluded him as a citizen of Nigeria from notifying the NBA of a misconduct and outright disregard of the Rules of Profession conduct by its member particularly where the making of a false statement or perjury is concerned.
He however explained that the petition he wrote to the NBA was against a lawyer and a witness and that the petition was written in his personal capacity as a Nigerian, complaining about a professional misconduct in line with the tenets of the Legal Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee who is authorized to receive such complaints.
Ruling on the application last Wednesday, Justice Williams held that once the court grants a bail to an accused person; it ought not in law revoke such bail, unless there is evidence of some changed circumstances placed before it.
According to the judge, unfortunately for the first defendant, there was ample evidence of changed circumstances, adding that the defendant has been restless.
The judge held that it appears that the defendant would rather take matters into his own hands instead of leaving the court to determine the suit expeditiously.
“I am persuaded that he should be placed in custody so that he does not continue into the muddy waters and disturb the progress of this case. Accordingly, the bail granted to the first defendant is hereby revoked”, Justice Williams ruled.