By Editor.
The prosecution today, Friday, October 25, 2019, told a Federal High Court in Lagos that its witness was “tampered” with by the defence, to change his evidence in the ongoing trial of former governor of Ekiti State, Mr. Ayodele Fayose.
The prosecutor for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) made the statement at the resumed trial of Fayose, who is facing charges bordering on N6.9billion fraud.
Jacobs was responding to an application by the team of defence counsel, Messrs Ola Olanipekun (SAN) and Olalekan Ojo (SAN), challenging the competence of a proposed third witness sought to be sworn on oath.
Fayose is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over N6.9billion fraud and money laundering charges.
He was first arraigned on Oct. 22. 2018, before Justice Mojisola Olatotegun, alongside his company, Spotless Investment Ltd, on 11 count-charge.
He had pleaded not guilty to the charges and was granted bail on October 24, 2018, in the sum of N50 million with sureties in like sum.
The defendant was subsequently re-arraigned before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, on July 2, after the case was withdrawn from Olatoregun following EFCC’s petition.
He had also pleaded not guilty to the charges and was allowed to continue on the earlier bail granted while the case was adjourned for trial.
At the last adjourned date on Octocber 21, EFCC called its first witness, Mr Lawrence Akande, a Zonal Head of Zenith Bank Plc, covering South-West zone
On Oct. 22, the commission had also called its second witness, Mr Abiodun Oshode, also a Zenith Bank Zonal Head covering South-West two. Both witnesses had concluded their evidences, they were cross-examined and discharged.
On Friday, EFCC called its third witness, Mr Johnson Abidakun, who is Head of Operations Zenith Bank, Ado-Ekiti branch. The witness entered the box and was about to be sworn on oath,when first defence counsel, Olanipekun raised objection supported by Ojo.
Defence had accused the EFCC of “prosecutorial misconduct” on the grounds that they (defence) had sought leave of court to study the proof of evidence of the witness and had noticed he made judicial statements.
Recall that the prosecution had called its 13th witness, one Mr. Adewale Aladegbola, who had during trial introduced himself as driver of a bullion van in the Ado-Ekiti branch of Zenith Bank during the aborted trial before Justice Olatoregun.
Defence counsel told Justice Aneke that although the testimony of that witness was abruptly stopped by the prosecution, they never declared him hostile, but has now called the instant witness (Abidakun) to “cure” the lacuna of that previous witness.
Second defence counsel, Ojo, described this procedure as a prosecutorial misconduct.
In response, Jacobs who appeared irked by the assertions of defence counsel, said:“I thank God that my learned friend is not the one presiding; they have alleged prosecutorial misconduct on my part, and so. I have to explain to my lord that we did not misconduct ourselves.
“It is just because of my relationship with defence counsel, otherwise, I know what his client (referring to Fayose) would have been going through by now.
“I know what happened with that witness; We obtained statements from that witness, he was in the witness box, only for him to be approached later and asked to change his evidence.
“He was visited in his house; and the witness made statement to the EFCC afterwards,” he said.
At this point the defence raised objection on the grounds that the prosecutor could not be giving evidence on such scenario, as he was not present or an eye witness.
There were subsequently, objections, replies and replies on points of law, before the judge said he would give an adjournment to enable him decide on the issues raised.
He consequently, adjourned the case until November 28 by 12 noon and November 29 by 9.am for ruling and continuation of trial.
